Bonnie Tyler

i mean like you download a gamexD hmmm
me and my friend use the same internet serve which is AT&T
downlad a game 4 ex. gunbound
itz only take him 2 hrz to download
mine is is like 11 hrz so yeah
i download itz over night u can tell xD
plz help meh<3

ask AT&T for higher subscription like T1,T2 or E1.. then you’ll have a highway in the internet… I have mine T1..

T1 — you own a subscription line solo.
DSL — you and your neighbors had a single subscription line (all of you).

What Are The Advantages Of T1 Over DSL?
# T1 is more reliable. For a T1 line the SLA (Service Level Agreement) and QoS (Quality of Service) are likely to be better, which means if your connections goes down, you will get a solution is hours, not days.
# T1 is more dedicated. A provider could have hundreds of subscribers from a DSL line, while a T1 line is only yours.

have it done.. probably add a small cost for this..

T1 providers link http://www.allisp.info/t1/T1-providers.php

Hello everyone,

I have dial-up internet. High-speed (including Satellite… Darn trees!!) is out of reach for me.

My main question is: When I’m downloading something, sometimes I’ll get a spike of up to 20 kb/s. Sometimes it will even stay at 20 kb/s for a few minutes. My average speed is about 2.9 kb/s.

I usually hit these spikes and faster speeds really late at night (past midnight). I’m wondering why my average speed is only about 2.9 kb/s when my internet obviously has the capability to go at least 20 kb/s.

Why does dial-up go so slow if it can spike (and sometimes sustain) almost 10x faster? Why can’t it STAY at it’s full potential?

Please note: I don’t have any background downloads (or anything else) eating up bandwidth with my normal speed of 2.9 kb/s or my spikes of 20 kb/s.

With Dial up service there are multiple factors affecting the kind of download speed you see.

First there is Connection speed. Your modem is capable of a 56K connection or pipe (bandwidth if you like). You will never see this because it is capped/limited by your ISP per FCC regulations to no more than 53k and 44k or so is common. This is then can be further reduced once your machine attempts to connect into ISP.

When you first connect to your provider by dialing up, the speed of the connection is negotiated between your machine and the ISP in a process called "handshaking". This handshaking establishes how fast you can receive data based on line noise, strength of signal, version of software, and how fast you can transmit data. Your modem exchanges information with the ISP’s Modem. You establish a connection. You establish connection speed

The next thing in the equation is Download speed or Throughput. It is not the same as connection speed.

Real data has things attached to it as it travels through the internet. These things are headers, protocols, checksums, routing infomation, mac addresses and other things. All together they make a packet. Data moves around the network in packets. Packets have this extra information (sometimes known as overhead) and it takes time to process and strip away the extra information as soon as it is no longer needed.

The speed of the download is affected by the distance these packets had to travel, or if they got scattered about trying to get to you by different paths or arrived out of order. Download speed is affected by having to re-ask to have information sent again because it came up missing. It can vary quite a bit. All the equipment the packet has to hop through to get to you plays a bit part of the throughput to you. You have to ask, acknowledge, for each packet that flows from the source to you and back again.

Mind you 2.9k is a bit slow, I would expect more in the range of 4 to 5k to be more like it. Ask your Isp to give you suggestions for better throughput.
You could need a better telephone line, or need a better modem, or even some firmware or settings to open up to how quick you can receive packets.

The 20k jump you see could be a number of things. These could be empty packets (no data in them) if I had to guess. Might be less traffic on the ISP side of things and throughput gets better. Not likely to explain a 20k difference.

I hope this explains some of the dynamics of what is happening beyond your machine and why downloads are what they are for dialups.

Sir:

I agree with you. LIGHT IS NEVER INDEPENDENT OF SOURCE. Below is my observations, posted in phys forums, brought to the attention of NASA, below, and askastro.com. So far no response. But that article causes my suspension unfairly by phys forums. I shall appreciate very much to hear from your end.. you can follow up with NASA.

Jose S. Aldea
Chairman – Capiz scientists & Inventors Society
jsaldea12@yahoo.com

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

9.10.09
CONTACT NASA
Public-inquiries@hq.nasa.gov

Sir/madam;

Kindly permit me to follow status/development of below reprint observation, “What is total speed of light?” with request for re-investigation on the ride-on concept. Below is reprint of the submitted observation. Am I right or wrong (a) on the ride on concept which is also the concept of NASA. (b) the reference in Michelson-Morley experiment needs to be expanded. (c) The super-luminal velocity of jet emanating from center of galaxy exceeding the speed of light could be real, not illusion. Hubble telescope, stationed in clear outer space and Chandra radio telescope which took the pictures cannot be BOTH wrong. Reiterating, I shall appreciate very much status/development. Thank you.

Very truly yours,

Jose s. Aldea
Chairman – Capiz scientists & inventors Society
jsaldea12@yahoo.com

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

REPRINT:

8.30.09

CONTACT NASA
Public-inquiries@hq,nasa,gov

Re: Request re-investigation, re-evaluation of jet faster than light

Sir/madam:

What is the total speed of light?

In the Michelson-Morley experiment, the frame reference used were: interferometer, mirrors, and source of light, all inside one area of earth. As far as that reference, that small area is concerned, light is the same, constant at 186,000 miles/sec. anywhere it is pointed, everything inside moves as one and light is constant.. But in bigger context, bigger reference, re- the entire earth wherein the light emanates, and a detached observer OUTSIDE earth: a light emanating from earth to outer space will be seen by the detached outside observer, as follows: light constant speed riding on the speeding earth, just like a detached observer on sidewalk will see a vehicle (representing earth) at night moving with light on. Thus, the total speed of light is constant 186,000 miles plus its ride-on on speeding earth of 68,000 miles per/hr. There is no question that light is constant, is 186,000 miles/sec. It is the frame reference that needs to be expanded.
Light is never independent of source, like that vehicle with light put on and off. This ride on of light on moving earth conforms with the ride-on computation by NASA of speed of earth which orbits sun, the sun orbits Milky Way, etc, with total accumulated speeds of earth of over 500,000 miles per/hr., the total ride-on speed of earth within Milky Way.

This ride-on may explain why colliding galaxies, some thirty to forty years ago, were detected by a number of reputable astronomers moving toward one another, each, at speed faster than light. A galaxy has speed of 1.5 million miles per/hr, more or less. This observation was later modified because nothing is faster than light. This ride-on may explain why super-luminal velocity of super-jet, emanating from center of galaxy was detected faster than speed of light. This observation was later considered “illusion”. But if light rides on motion of sources, like moving earth, like colliding galaxies, like super-jets, it is not impossible, as explained in preceding paragraph, that total speed of light exceeding its own constant speed is possible..

Referring to the super-luminal velocity of jet moving 3 times the speed of light being ride-on: It appears strongly that Hubble telescope, which is stationed on outer space, cannot be both wrong. That photograph of the super-luminal velocity of super-pressurized jettison emanating from center of galaxy, a super=ressurized black hole, may be real…not an illusion.

In this connection, permit undersigned to request NASA to re-investigate that jet emanating from galaxy moving faster than light, in the light of above stated observations.

Please respond. Thank you.

Very truly yours,

Jose S. Aldea
Chairman – Capiz Scientists & Inventors Society

Cc: phys forums

Science should always be open to new ideas and concepts.

However,it is generally recognized that the burden of proof rests with the new idea IF the older concept is well understood, backed by observation,experiment and consistent logical theory.

the idea that C is a universal property whaich MUST be the same from all observers in all states of relative motion is very subtle and contradicts "common sense" addition of velocities.

I am not competent to evaluate your ideas, that is the job of the Science societies and publishers of scientific journals.

He said that time goes slower, the faster your speed. A few minutes later he was talking about GPS stellites going 18,000 miles per hour, and sending an image to Earth. I was half asleep, but I could have sworn that he said that if the time was traveling slower for the satellite, then the image would be jumbled! Or he might have said that it is proof that time does travel slower when you travel faster. Which one is it?

Time is relative to the frame it is measured in. Thus, on the GPS satellite, time appears to be passing at what might be called rest-time rate. Rest-time because an on board observer would be at rest wrt the GPS.

But an outside observer (and receiver of the GPS signal) would see time dilate on the GPS. As f = n/T; where f is frequency, n is number of cycles, and T is the period, we see that if T’ = T + deltaT, the dilated frequency f’ < f will lower than the rest frequency f as far as the outside observer is concerned. deltaT is that bit of time dilation seen by the outside observer and due to the velocity and gravity effects on the satellite.

Unless the GPS receievers are tuned to f’ instead of f, the rest frequency, they will be jumbled just like any radio that is not tuned in properly. To a point, the difference between f and f’ is very very tiny because the velocities, compared to light speed, are very very tiny. So the receivers won’t be that messed up.

Also give reviews on its speed . is it really as fast as a 512 kbps broadband connection?

it is very easy,about What are the night tarrifs for airtel broadband 500 home plan with speed 512kbps Yahoo searching link:
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A9FJqzjX9oRFQm0BDqPal8kF/SIG=11atfeh45/EXP=1166428247/**%68%74%74%70%3A%2F%2F%77%77%77%2E%6C%6F%67%61%62%63%2E%63%6F%6D

What is the total speed of light?
(Light is not independent from source)

( Because of this article, author was suspended by “phys forums”. It is lamentable that the peer scientists at the opposite side of world were not able to understand. This article was submitted to askastro, posted to astronomy forums, yahoo questions/answers, and, repeatedly, to NASA but up to now, almost a month, no response from NASA. This article is revised, clearer. jsaldea12)

In the famous Michelson-Morley experiment which measured the speed of light, the frame reference used were: interferometer, mirrors, light source, and observer, all connected to earth. As far as that frame reference, everything connected to earth moves as ONE with earth motion, including light, whose source is earth (it is like car full of passengers that move as ONE with the motion of car) . But in bigger context, bigger reference, re- earth and light therefrom are separate from a detached observer OUTSIDE earth’s gravitational pull, the observer would see such light, emanating from earth to outer space, riding on the motion of earth (just like passengers moving as one in motion of car). It is, too, like a detached observer on sidewalk at night, watching a car moving and seeing light emanating from head beam that wherever the car goes, light follows completely, at that same speed, same constant speed of 186,000 miles per/sec. but such light is not independent from source, the head beam, of the car. Switch off the head beam and there is no light because without the source, per si, there is no light. There is no question that light has constant speed of 186,000 miles per/sec. for as long as the source of light is on. Thus, to arrive, for instance, at total speed of light on earth motion around the sun, re- constant speed of light of 186,000 miles per/sec. plus ride on earth with speed of 18 miles per/sec.. = 186,018 miles per/sec. ,the total ride-on speed of light on earth motion around the sun. This ride-on concept speed of light is patterned after the ride-on computation by Standard University and NASA of total speed of earth around milky way, re- earth circling the sun, the sun circling Milky Way, Milky way circling on itself, thus, earth’s total ride-on speeds is over 500,000 miles per/hr. around Milky Way. How was that scientifically accepted concept that “light is independent of source” came about? When the Michelson-Morley experiment measured the speed of light (last decade of 18th century and first decade of 19th century), it further, tried to detect ripple of ether on orbit of earth of 18 miles per/sec. but no ripple was detected, instead the interferometer found, amazingly, that light was the same, constant in all direction, thus because light was the same, constant, regardless of motion of earth of 18 miles per/sec., it was concluded that “light is independent of source”, but it is not. Reiterating, light, per si, is not independent from source. (pls. refer to above illustrations on outside observer and the car).

This ride-on concept may explain why colliding galaxies, some thirty to forty years ago, were detected by a number of reputable astronomers moving toward one another, each, at speed faster than light. A galaxy has speed of 1.5 million miles per/hr, more or less. This observation was later modified because nothing is faster than light. This ride-on may explain why, it is becoming common, super-luminal velocity of super-jet, emanating from center of galaxy, a black hole, was detected faster than speed of light. This observation was later considered “illusion”. But if light rides on motion of sources, like orbiting earth, like colliding galaxies, like super-jets, it is not impossible, that total speed of light exceeding its own constant speed is possible. Hubble telescope, stationed on outer space and Chandra X-ray telescope which took the photographs of the super-luminal velocity of super-pressurized jettison emanating from center of galaxy, a black hole, cannot be BOTH wrong. That FTL (faster than light) luminal velocity of super jet is real…not an illusion. Special Relativity is not closed, does not forbid particles moving faster than the speed of light.

Jsantosaldea12

Chairman – Capiz Scientists & Inventors Society
e-mail: jsaldea12@yahoo.com

9.21.09

the speed of ligth is always the same approximately 3.08*10^8.it does not matter whether it is x ray or gamma or what ever form of ligth.the wavelengh and the frequency is what changes for different forms of ligths.

I dont want blurry images. thats what happened last night when i shut a batter at a baseball game.

The fastest shutter speed is 1/3200.

If you don’t want blurry images, you need to do more than just set the fastest shutter speed. In dim lighting, your images won’t come out right or the camera will give out of range readings.

Instead, as the light dims, you first need to increase your sensor sensitivity by increasing the ISO. The S3 IS has a maximum ISO of 800.

Next, instead of setting the fastest shutter speed, I would suggest choosing the icon for the running person. That’s the sports mode. It’s just above the "SCN" on your control dial. It will give you the fastest shutter speed that will still properly expose and set it all automatically.

Hope that helps!

Camera shopping.. im currently looking at the sony Cybershots or the Canons… also looking for something @ reasonable price, user-friendly that takes excellent day and night shots, and zoom thats about 3x. What do you recommend me?
I only want to spend $300 for a camera and just use to to take pictures of friends, events, or u know just everyday use. Not for professional use just for fun. Everybody has one but I want my own.. i will actually use it

Nikon D-40. It’s a little expensive but very worth the price if you are really interested in photography.

I think if the moon travels around the earth any faster (or slower) in any one night we would see difference in its phase. i.e. a quarter moon, could be more (or less) as the moon travels trough our sky. Is this right?

It would have to move much faster to really notice a difference from moonrise to moon set.

I can’t even tell the difference 24 hours later, and it has gone through about a 7% illumination change in that timeframe.

night seems to be faster than day because we sleep at night. sleeping is the only time we enjoy the moment and we are not aware of time
( Past or Future ). When we enjoy the present moment , we are not aware of the time, that"s we are enjoying the moment.When we are aware of the time, it seems longer. Time actually is only a concept not a fact.

In short the way to live successfully is to live in the present .